In the face of increasing governance complexity, shifting economic contexts, and rising public expectations, institutional performance and sustainability have emerged as critical indicators of organizational success and societal trust. This study investigates the dual dimensions of institutional failure and sustainability by analyzing both the internal and external factors that contribute to poor performance and the strategies that foster long-term viability. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 80 employees across various institutional levels through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that poor strategic planning, erosion of public trust, financial mismanagement, low staff morale, and weak governance structures are the strongest predictors of institutional failure, collectively accounting for 72% of the variance (R2 = 0.72). Conversely, qualitative and quantitative findings identified leadership practices, regular staff feedback, growth opportunities, competitive compensation, and improved work conditions as key strategies enhancing institutional sustainability, with an explanatory power of 74% (R2 = 0.74). The results emphasize the importance of an integrated, employee-centered approach that combines strategic leadership, transparent governance, and human resource development. The study concludes with practical recommendations for institutional reform, including strategic planning, merit-based recruitment, staff development, and enhanced accountability mechanisms to foster resilient and high-performing institutions.
| Published in | Research and Innovation (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14 |
| Page(s) | 20-27 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Factors Influencing, Institutional Failure, Strategies, Enhancing, Performance, Sustainability
| [1] | Andrews, M., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2012). Strategic Planning and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 635–645. |
| [2] | Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. Palgrave Macmillan. |
| [3] | Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Addison-Wesley. |
| [4] | Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page. |
| [5] | Baron, A., & Armstrong, M. (2007). Human capital management: Achieving added value through people. Kogan Page. |
| [6] | Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of good governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343. |
| [7] | Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. John Wiley & Sons. |
| [8] | Burnes, B. (2017). Managing change. Pearson Education. |
| [9] | Diamond, J., & Khemani, P. (2006). Introducing financial management information systems in developing countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(3), 97–132. |
| [10] | Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 579–599. |
| [11] | Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. |
| [12] | Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 87–96. |
| [13] | Kim, S. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–635. |
| [14] | Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. |
| [15] | Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Press. |
| [16] | Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48. |
| [17] | Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. |
| [18] | Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. |
| [19] | London, M. (2003). Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement. Psychology Press. |
| [20] | Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications. |
| [21] | Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. |
| [22] | Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. |
| [23] | Schiavo-Campo, S., & Sundaram, P. (2001). To serve and to preserve: Improving public administration in a competitive world. Asian Development Bank. |
| [24] | Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Sage Publications. |
| [25] | Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. |
| [26] | Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2007). Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis. Working Paper, Cornell University ILR School. |
APA Style
Ntabakirabose, G., RithaTumukunde, Ndaruhutse, F., Mburu, D. M., Mbabazize, M. (2025). An Assessment of the Factors Influencing Institutional Failure, and the Strategies for Enhancing Performance and Sustainability. Research and Innovation, 1(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14
ACS Style
Ntabakirabose, G.; RithaTumukunde; Ndaruhutse, F.; Mburu, D. M.; Mbabazize, M. An Assessment of the Factors Influencing Institutional Failure, and the Strategies for Enhancing Performance and Sustainability. Res. Innovation 2025, 1(1), 20-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14,
author = {Gaspard Ntabakirabose and RithaTumukunde and Felicien Ndaruhutse and David Mwehia Mburu and Mbabazi Mbabazize},
title = {An Assessment of the Factors Influencing Institutional Failure, and the Strategies for Enhancing Performance and Sustainability},
journal = {Research and Innovation},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {20-27},
doi = {10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ri.20250101.14},
abstract = {In the face of increasing governance complexity, shifting economic contexts, and rising public expectations, institutional performance and sustainability have emerged as critical indicators of organizational success and societal trust. This study investigates the dual dimensions of institutional failure and sustainability by analyzing both the internal and external factors that contribute to poor performance and the strategies that foster long-term viability. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 80 employees across various institutional levels through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that poor strategic planning, erosion of public trust, financial mismanagement, low staff morale, and weak governance structures are the strongest predictors of institutional failure, collectively accounting for 72% of the variance (R2 = 0.72). Conversely, qualitative and quantitative findings identified leadership practices, regular staff feedback, growth opportunities, competitive compensation, and improved work conditions as key strategies enhancing institutional sustainability, with an explanatory power of 74% (R2 = 0.74). The results emphasize the importance of an integrated, employee-centered approach that combines strategic leadership, transparent governance, and human resource development. The study concludes with practical recommendations for institutional reform, including strategic planning, merit-based recruitment, staff development, and enhanced accountability mechanisms to foster resilient and high-performing institutions.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - An Assessment of the Factors Influencing Institutional Failure, and the Strategies for Enhancing Performance and Sustainability AU - Gaspard Ntabakirabose AU - RithaTumukunde AU - Felicien Ndaruhutse AU - David Mwehia Mburu AU - Mbabazi Mbabazize Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14 T2 - Research and Innovation JF - Research and Innovation JO - Research and Innovation SP - 20 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ri.20250101.14 AB - In the face of increasing governance complexity, shifting economic contexts, and rising public expectations, institutional performance and sustainability have emerged as critical indicators of organizational success and societal trust. This study investigates the dual dimensions of institutional failure and sustainability by analyzing both the internal and external factors that contribute to poor performance and the strategies that foster long-term viability. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 80 employees across various institutional levels through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that poor strategic planning, erosion of public trust, financial mismanagement, low staff morale, and weak governance structures are the strongest predictors of institutional failure, collectively accounting for 72% of the variance (R2 = 0.72). Conversely, qualitative and quantitative findings identified leadership practices, regular staff feedback, growth opportunities, competitive compensation, and improved work conditions as key strategies enhancing institutional sustainability, with an explanatory power of 74% (R2 = 0.74). The results emphasize the importance of an integrated, employee-centered approach that combines strategic leadership, transparent governance, and human resource development. The study concludes with practical recommendations for institutional reform, including strategic planning, merit-based recruitment, staff development, and enhanced accountability mechanisms to foster resilient and high-performing institutions. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -
Forest Research Department, Rwanda Forestry Authority, Huye, Rwanda
